El grupo al cual envías entradas es un grupo Usenet. Si envías mensajes a este grupo, cualquier usuario de Internet podrá ver tu dirección de correo electrónico
> Tried finding in 3 different places, giving up: SNAFU cannot find my ass > with both hands in the dark and a flashlight
> HackerNode in Exclude List, using anyway, followed by crazy browser > error messages requirng d/c from tor and reload of browser: Translation: > SNAFU- > we don't care what mamma boy sh*ithead runs a server on our network, > even if it's the NSA fucking with people, we make you expose your system > anyways regardless of what you want, cuz we don't give a sh*it about > general users, we only cater to our nerd "better than you are" group.
> Tried to connect to PASSWORDMINERNODE, trying new circuit: Translation: > SNAFU,-forgot to pay my electric bill sorry, no fu*ck off.
> When is some genius going to come up with something better than cr*ap TOR?
Why should users have to "configure it". Fucking moron Tor developers cannot put out a package that actually works well without someone having to finish their poorly designed program.
thorn wrote: > Why should users have to "configure it".
Don't mind Sliverdick, it blundered into the privacy groups a good while back and made a complete fool of itself with some hilarious "bar code encryption" idiocy and got thoroughly spanked over it. Now it drop in from time to time probably hoping nobody remembers.
They do. ;)
> Fucking moron Tor > developers cannot put out a package that actually works well without > someone having to finish their poorly designed program.
Tor works just fine out of the box. If you're having problems with it they're probably because you haven't a clue what you're doing.
RTFM. If you still can't sort out your problems then ask politely and someone will help you.
thorn wrote: > I have a clue, and it doesn't work just fine out of the box. > It is SLOOOWWWWW, drops connections, fails dns lookups unless you > have a high speed connection, then it is better. Does not work well > with slower connections, especially on wifi.
> Just too lazy to bother with all there techno crap. And don't want > to join their nerds group and kiss ass to get answers. They don't > really care if general public uses it anyways,else they would be on > this group instructing people. Also many unresolved questions as to > safety of Tor given all the hackers and gov. spooks running Tor > nodes.
Sorry, but every syllable you type says you really don't have a clue. Hell, you even told us WHY you remain willfully clueless.
You're also acting like a spoiled brat. What makes you think ANYONE should be in this particular group catering to you, especially the way you act? Do you visit your favorite restaurant to resolve car warranty issues then while and cry when they don't help you? Duh.
You'll never get any help if you don't grow up and at least invest a modicum of effort. That's the way life works in general, by the way. Think about it.
And please stop top posting. Lots of people will just ignore you when you do.
> >> I have a clue, and it doesn't work just fine out of the box. > >> It is SLOOOWWWWW, drops connections, fails dns lookups unless you > >> have a high speed connection, then it is better. Does not work > well > >> with slower connections, especially on wifi.
> >> Just too lazy to bother with all there techno crap. And don't > want > >> to join their nerds group and kiss ass to get answers. They don't > >> really care if general public uses it anyways,else they would be > on > >> this group instructing people. Also many unresolved questions as > to > >> safety of Tor given all the hackers and gov. spooks running Tor > >> nodes.
> > Sorry, but every syllable you type says you really don't have a > > clue. Hell, you even told us WHY you remain willfully clueless.
> <snip>
> > And please stop top posting. Lots of people will just ignore you > > when you do.
> I don't care if some ignore me. I don't have to conform to their > stupid rules of format. Most of these guys don't actually read and > comprehend posts before replying anyways.
> What specifically I have said indicates I "don't have a clue".
> Maybe you don't read this group much and see all the other > complaints here about TOR here in and A.P.? Not just me who is > complaining and wanting something better.
> Maybe ur the one who is clueless. If they want tor to be successful > they should not be such a group of nerd jerks and start cartering to > average computer users who don't have much interest in helping them > to reprogram their bad programming so that it DOES work out of the > box.
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:59:24 +0000 (UTC), thorn wrote: > Why should users have to "configure it". Fucking moron Tor > developers cannot put out a package that actually works well without > someone having to finish their poorly designed program.
You don't but I wanted to show that you haven't a fucking clue what you are blithering about. -- http://tr.im/1fa6
|
