Mensaje del debate
free illegal underage bbs preteen lolita pedo lolis young girl sex pics
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rcn.net!news.rcn.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:37:58 -0500
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:37:53 -0400
From: PDFrank <pdfr...@some.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.text.pdf
Subject: Re: free illegal underage bbs preteen lolita pedo lolis young girl
sex pics
References: <47d64f04$0$6866$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <13tctlk50sckfc9@corp.supernews.com> <13tdcmonbqou098@corp.supernews.com> <13tdgk4khs5osa7@corp.supernews.com> <I5WdnRK7CPIJsEranZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@rcn.net> <13tekagdd16coa0@corp.supernews.com> <s_GdneG_NoA170ranZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@rcn.net> <fb8cac06-ca5a-4700-b84c-3465ff24dae4@n36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <13th22pc82meq78@corp.supernews.com> <y5CdnRDImcvQEkXanZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@rcn.net> <13tiemr2ntg6m0a@corp.supernews.com>
In-Reply-To: <13tiemr2ntg6m0a@corp.supernews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <pP6dnSAmK7qrL0HanZ2dnUVZ_uvinZ2d@rcn.net>
Lines: 5
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.164.200.76
X-Trace: sv3-JUewcSucf9dO5lIfeX25vkpUAQfuKB8RJai6LA9uuM1VotP0Ps1BCgthjP5RUI3veB7/t4gYbUyLs3J!vMh6jo9/hQkYHA97fy8o8OfBvthAn1Xzel7LRoOT++IfIleG5XmWLd8Ib2dceraJZ9QDv1Mhyd98!/hU=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@rcn.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.37
Don Schmidt wrote:
> I'll chalk it up as a win for our side.
What did "our side" win, Mr. Schmidt, and what was the "game?"
|
