Mensaje del debate
free illegal underage bbs preteen lolita pedo lolis young girl sex pics
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: rpresser <rpres...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.text.pdf
Subject: Re: free illegal underage bbs preteen lolita pedo lolis young girl
sex pics
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <0ac3d06d-1f33-4a1c-a27e-27a6240b6714@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <47d64f04$0$6866$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
<13tctlk50sckfc9@corp.supernews.com> <13tdcmonbqou098@corp.supernews.com>
<13tdgk4khs5osa7@corp.supernews.com> <I5WdnRK7CPIJsEranZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@rcn.net>
<13tekagdd16coa0@corp.supernews.com> <s_GdneG_NoA170ranZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@rcn.net>
<fb8cac06-ca5a-4700-b84c-3465ff24dae4@n36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<13th22pc82meq78@corp.supernews.com> <y5CdnRDImcvQEkXanZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@rcn.net>
<13tiemr2ntg6m0a@corp.supernews.com> <pP6dnSAmK7qrL0HanZ2dnUVZ_uvinZ2d@rcn.net>
<13tq6e911svub66@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.145.99.210
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1205787912 1122 127.0.0.1 (17 Mar 2008 21:05:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:05:12 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=146.145.99.210;
posting-account=SOVadwoAAAB3h7W1MLW9kMYtEc2JW2L8
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b4)
Gecko/2008030714 Firefox/3.0b4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
On Mar 16, 9:00=A0am, "Don Schmidt" <Don Engin...@PNB.Retired_1987>
wrote:
> The prize is a 2 lb drum of Nonni's Biscotti; just like the old country!
>
> The game, it's better to be on the top viruses being on the bottom. =A0It'=
s
> one of those controversial opinions much like Reverse Polish Notation vers=
us
> Algebraic Calculation. =A0Of course RPN wins that "game".
Postfix notation (or as you call it, RPN) is no better than any other
notation in and of itself. It's slightly easier to implement in a
stack machine, but no moreso than prefix notation. Prefix is often
easier to read, though this is mostly a matter of training. All three
notations (prefix, infix, postfix) become very difficult to use when
the nesting level is very high.
Similar remarks can be made about Usenet. If you view Usenet as a
wide, extended conversation, that you expect others to wander into and
out of at random, it makes sense to present it as a narrative. How
many novels have you read lately where the newest stuff is at the
top?
On the other hand, in a tight exchange between a few individuals who
have been closely following since the beginning, it may seem easier to
just add new messages to the top of the stack. The presumed advantage
is that you can read what's new quickly, and if you have to go back a
few levels to catch up, it's not serious. But it repels newcomers to
the conversation. On Usenet it is generally considered highly
impolite; and your conduct in this conversation matches that
assessment.
|
