~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'd like to remind folks that libelous slander, in the United States,
only exists in cases in which an issuer's claims are not true. In the
U.K. that is not true and we are not in the U.K. That said, here is the
latest, small chapter in the psy-op known as the Mike Ruppert Entourage.

Lori Price of CLG (Citizens for a Legitimate Government) runs a 9/11
listserv at Riseup.net. It was, at one time, one of Mike Ruppert's
mailing lists. By and large, folks tuned in to find out the latest on
the 9/11 investigation and, at the time, most of the good ones were
expected to come from Mike. I felt the same way.

I recall the day when I first submitted my research on the Mitre and
Ptech connections to 9/11 to a list Mike was on and it is the one at
Yahoo Groups known as CIA-Drugs. I had already had a bad bout with Mike
(not the moderator) when he claimed that the usage of methamphetamines
by intelligence agencies to practice behavior modification was off topic
for a list whose purpose was to unearth the connection between the uses
and sales of drugs and the activities of intelligence agencies.

Yeah, I know it's crazy.

As to the Mitre and Ptech connections to 9/11 he said they were so
ridiculous that he didn't even need to look at them. That's right: they
were so ludicrous, that they didn't even warrant the kind of examination
that determines if something is ludicrous in the first place. That's
called a rabbit hole, friends.

Some months later, at the list moderated by Lori Price, I submitted the
evidence again. Mike was on the list but I was not looking for his
approval anymore. I already knew what I needed to know about Mike
Ruppert. No, I was attempting to put this information between serious
researchers, some of whom were obviously drawn to any list with him on
it. As well, I thought, maybe he would reconsider and tackle the
information or maybe he would be forced to by the tide of other
researchers and public demand.

That was not to happen.  Out of the blue, I was told to stop making
libelous statements about Mike and though, believe you me, they were on
my mind, at this time I had never made any accusations against Mike
Ruppert. This is a typical rabbit hole invitation. It put me immediately
in the position of having to explain myself instead of Mike having to
explain why he was attempting to squash my researcher (an oft used
tactic by Mike, as you can see by reading up on the supplied links
below), which is the situation I was hoping to facilitate. Of course, as
I have said, I had not at this point issued any accusations against Mike
but obviously he knew they were coming and so did Lori.

After Lori told the list that I was attempting to hack the list (during
the period that I, miraculously, didn't have access to the list and was,
therefore, unable to respond to the accusations, let alone know that
they existed) I contacted Riseup admin, the host of my email address and
the mailing list Lori and Mike headed. Lori had told the list that the
matter was being investigated with the Riseup Collective but the
collective told me that Lori had never even contacted them.

Many more moons passed and Mike was discredited (in most serious 9/11
circles). His publication, From the Wilderness, was eventually forced to
cover the story and they did their own spin that left out any Israeli
involvement (Christopher Bollyn's research on the same left out the
Saudi connections). Saudi and Israeli space outfits work very closely
together and this is one thing systematically obscured by both
"journalists." Can you say 'controlled opposition?'

Recently , Bollyn claimed to have incredible new leads but he was not
going to send out the information because he didn't have the funding.
This is not Life Magazine; it's the internet! I blogged relentlessly and
widely, for years, from the position of homelessness so don't gimme no
crap! If Bollyn is legitimate, he will not hold the truth hostage for
more donations. Disgusting!

Well, here it is now in 2008 and Price continues to be a large scale
presence on the world wide web. She seems to be putting out good
information so I though, ya know, maybe she's legit.

I decided to ask her for her take on Ruppert now. After years, and after
having had Lori on mailing lists of mine prior to even ever
communicating with Mike, I though maybe she fought dirty but maybe she
just didn't realize whose side she was on. Maybe she deserved a chance,
after all.

I ask you the reader, after all of that, what are the chances that Lori
would simply not remember me or the whole shebang she was a part of for
months? What are the chances that such conscious manipulation could go
merely forgotten in the next few years? "I don't remember," is not the
trademark of a reliable journalist but it is the trademark of a
politician, i.e. a manipulator.

Of course, now that my research and that of others' IS getting its due
and Ruppert is ignored, the only thing that will save face now that my
credibility actually rises above Mike's (perhaps not among the public
but most accomplished 9/11 researchers around know the research) is to
lay the groundwork for a series of lies. The campaign is begun, if on a
very small scale. The stance being adopted by Lori Price is deny, deny,
deny!

I couldn't let this go unreported. To this day, I knew that she was
either deluded or a spook and a simple, even friendly email often does a
nice job of revealing which. If she had been deluded she might
apologize. If she was merely convinced that most others are now deluded
about Mike, a lot of things could have come as a response. If she was a
spook, however, you can expect mixed signals such as being defensive and
even going on the attack as you pretend to not know what is being
alluded to.

One question I posed to her just this morning is: "Weren't you there
when someone introduced the Mitre and Ptech leads and everyone,
including Ruppert and yourself, told that person to get lost and even
told people that that person was attempting to hack the list."

Her response:

I have never even met Mike Ruppert or was at any
such conference. You obviously have me mixed up with someone else, but I
am too busy and
I DON'T CARE.
I owe you NO explanations - you're another lunatic on the Web.

L. P.

So I am to believe that one Lori Price has been replaced, at the same
email address (with the same outfit - CLG) by someone that I am mixing
up with the old Lori Price - at the same email address. If true, then
why is the job of being Lori Price rotated?!?

Of course she knows what I am talking about, as is indicated by my
previous exchange with her, even earlier this morning where I wrote:

Now that Ruppert is discredited and even From the Wilderness has been
forced to cover the Mitre and Ptech connections, what is your stance on
the issue?

Her response:

WHAT issue, nutjob?

Feigning a lack of understanding, she knows enough to go immediately on
the offensive (this was the entirety of my first contact to her in
several years). The only person that could pull off not remembering
months of such activity is someone who either lies so much that they
can't possibly sort it all out or someone who is so dense and has such a
bad memory that any news disseminated by said person should not be trusted.

Nutjob indeed. The Zionazi juggernaut is failing, Lori. You are losing.

Her mailing list at Riseup shows the following in the list description:

The Israeli/Palestinian debate is not welcome dialogue for the group.
Moreover, comments/theories blaming an ethnic or religious group for the
9-11 terrorist attacks are not permitted.

Neat, eh? We can mention Saudi's because it is not an ethnicity like
'Arab' is but what about a state in which the national identity, the
racial identity, and religious identity are all tied up in one? That
pretty much excludes any discussion of Israel; in fact she specifically
says that we cannot even mention the suffering of the Palestinians. How
very, very neat.

I just thought everyone should know.

If you give a man the correct information for seven years, he may
believe the incorrect information on the first day of the eighth year
when it is necessary, from your point of view, that he should do so.
Your first job is to build the credibility and the authenticity of your
propaganda, and persuade the enemy to trust you although you are his
enemy. ~ A Psychological Warfare Casebook Operations Research Office
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore (1958)

I have no idea of Citizens for a Legitimate Government is, itself,
controlled opposition but I think so. Everything I have ever seen come
out of CLG has come from one of her email addresses.

Caveat Lector!

A large chunk of the research that Ruppert said was so ridiculous that
he did not even need to examine it to know if it had merit, is here:
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/search?q=9%2F11

On Mike Ruppert
http://justanotherblowback.blogspot.com/2006/09/on-mike-ruppert.html

Ruppert Calls Loose Change CIA Disinfo
http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/ruppertloosechange.html

Mike Ruppert Betrays 9-11 Movement Yet Again
http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/ruppertpentagon.html

Hey Ruppert: 9-11 is NOT Dead!
http://www.wingtv.net/ruppert911rip.html

Mike Ruppert: 9-11 Saboteur
http://www.wingtv.net/ruppertwingtv.html